This is early, but I have the basic functionality working. It's still quite crashy. If someone better at Blender Python picks this up, there is probably not much more to do to get it 100% functional.
EDIT: Looks like someone else beat me to this but didn't touch TextureBuddy - might be worth continuing regardless
Oh, and what about DoomED and GameBuddy in your workflow? Is there a way to get ahold of these? My E-mail address is Scott_Bro_1@outlook.com if it help to reach me quicker and once again great work I loved the video showing off more stuff.
Awesome! I like it. Do you have another version that might be more up to date? I would love to try it out. Yes, It reminds me of old school doom editor by here there is no need for computing BSP Trees though Duke Nuck'em used beck to front rendering. Love to see where this goes in the future and you might be ahead of this now that I look at it. So yes, I am very interested in any up-to-date information.
I've modified the script and updated it for blender 2.92. However The 'FAST' solver does not provide decent result while the 'EXACT' solver (which is not similar to 'CARVE' apparently) takes a very long time to proceed all the operations (or fail to provide a good result). This one also requires 'clean' sectors work and tolerate less freedom than the 'CARVE' solver.
So until they update or add a new solver, my conclusion is that we're stuck with the good old blender 2.79.
Your software looks great. I hope, my post can help to see, that there is interest in it. I know, hard times. Would be great to be able to use your Map-Editor in combination with Blender 2.80, 2.90 and up. I guess, if it would work with 2.80 it runs also on 2.9x. Thanks for making such a great tool. Wish you all the best. Kind regards from Berlin, Germany.
← Return to tool
Comments
Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.
Found this ported to Blender 3.0 here
https://github.com/hickVieira/LevelBuddyBlender3
I have started the migration myself of this to Blender 2.8+.
https://github.com/Reticulatas/LevelBuddyforBlender28
This is early, but I have the basic functionality working. It's still quite crashy. If someone better at Blender Python picks this up, there is probably not much more to do to get it 100% functional.
EDIT: Looks like someone else beat me to this but didn't touch TextureBuddy - might be worth continuing regardless
Oh, and what about DoomED and GameBuddy in your workflow? Is there a way to get ahold of these? My E-mail address is Scott_Bro_1@outlook.com if it help to reach me quicker and once again great work I loved the video showing off more stuff.
Awesome! I like it. Do you have another version that might be more up to date? I would love to try it out. Yes, It reminds me of old school doom editor by here there is no need for computing BSP Trees though Duke Nuck'em used beck to front rendering. Love to see where this goes in the future and you might be ahead of this now that I look at it. So yes, I am very interested in any up-to-date information.
Hello,
I've modified the script and updated it for blender 2.92. However The 'FAST' solver does not provide decent result while the 'EXACT' solver (which is not similar to 'CARVE' apparently) takes a very long time to proceed all the operations (or fail to provide a good result). This one also requires 'clean' sectors work and tolerate less freedom than the 'CARVE' solver.
So until they update or add a new solver, my conclusion is that we're stuck with the good old blender 2.79.
btw thank you for this tool!
Could you provide a link to your github or gitlab where you have the updated script?
https://github.com/ormusto/BlenderScripts
Thank you :)
Kudos to you man! I've never liked the old blender UI so this is a game-changer since its what kept me from actually using this addon
Thanks but as I said it doesn't really work well because of the boolean solvers.
Your software looks great. I hope, my post can help to see, that there is interest in it. I know, hard times. Would be great to be able to use your Map-Editor in combination with Blender 2.80, 2.90 and up. I guess, if it would work with 2.80 it runs also on 2.9x. Thanks for making such a great tool. Wish you all the best. Kind regards from Berlin, Germany.